You might think of your dog as your fur child, but the law would not agree. We wanted to be in-the-know on his issue, so we sat down with Louisville family attorney Eric Ashley for some clarity. Here’s what he said:
In certain areas, the law greatly lags behind society. This is true in technology, social media, and pets in divorce actions. In a typical divorce case, the two main disputes concern custody and property distribution. Currently, under the law there are two types of property: real and personal. Real property includes all real estate, and attachments. Personal property covers everything else; including pets.
In cases with children, usually the pets go with the children. In other cases, it isn’t so easy.
In most states, personal property and debt must be distributed equitably. I’m often asked: “whats an equitable property division?” Its different in every case; but it often isn’t equal.
Not much of an answer, I know.
This is especially difficult with pets. After all, how can you enjoy 1/2 of a pet? Or split up pets? Neither are good ideas.
Even worse, the method for distributing personal property is based on its fair market value. Fair market value is usually the price a willing buyer would pay to a willing seller for the property; in this case the pet. This is particularly devastating to pet owners, because the fair market value of a pet doesn’t begin to reflect the actual value to the owner. Yet under the current state of the law; courts cant take that into consideration.
Of course there are whispers of cases where Judges have deviated and applied the “best interest” standard to pets, which is normally reserved for children. “Best interest” standard, means the court looks at whats best for the children, rather than the interests of the parties. But applying that standard to pets is extraordinarily rare, even in the more progressive local jurisdictions.
A growing number of states (30, according to www.animallaw.info) give pets particular protection in domestic violence cases. Neither Kentucky nor Indiana do, as of the date of this article.
What if you aren’t married? Then you get to file a personal property lawsuit, which most jurisdictions call “trespass to chattel”. If you doubted me when I wrote this area of law is seriously lagging, using words like “chattel” should remove all doubt.
How to navigate this minefield? The law may change, which could govern pets much like children. But that’s far from certain. At best custody of pets is an area of the law in flux and underdeveloped in many jurisdictions; and non existent in others. This is particularly difficult, because it doesn’t give an attorney much indication on how a court is likely to rule. Which segues into my next point.
In litigation, although an attorney may have an idea; noone cannot control or accurately predict what a court will do. Otherwise, there would never be litigation. So the outcome is always unknown; and dealing with the unknown is always tricky. This is especially true when dealing with something as valuable as pets. The best way to control the outcome, especially regarding pets, is through an agreement via settlement.
Stay tuned for Part II – Types Of Settlement Agreements
If you are interested in private, in-your-home pet care services with Paws Pet Care Pet Sitting & Dog Walking call us at 502-802-5052 or email us at firstname.lastname@example.org